Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Parenting Debate

Dear Jack,

I have recently been involved in an epic parenting debate with myself. No, it's not the breast milk vs. formula debate. Or the co-sleeping vs. your own crib debate. Or the stay in the house or take you out debate. Or the to vaccinate or not debate. I actually had already decided all of those issues. The thing I had not fully settled on was whether or not to put shoes on you as a baby.

I know, I know. It seems like that isn't really a parenting decision that is debate worthy, but I swear I have had more conversations over this topic than any of the others I mentioned. It may well be that every polite person has decided that the breast milk vs. formula thing is too hot of a topic to touch on but the shoe issue makes for interesting conversation and that's why it has come up more. Regardless of the reason, the shoe debate rages on.

I think every single mother has an opinion on this one, too. (Fathers seem more ambivalent, for some reason.) The folks I have talked to who are anti-shoe for newborns have an argument that goes something like this: Babies do not actually need shoes since they don't walk. (Makes sense.) Therefore, shoes are a waste of money. (True.) A waste of money that may well irritate the baby for no good reason. (I guess that might be true.) And being purely decorative, it seems like the mother is dressing up the baby like a doll, rather than attending to what the baby needs, which is not shoes. (This may be taking it too far, I think.) Some of my anti-shoe friends stop their argument at the money part, others of them really do take offense at the idea of using the baby like a doll to dress up. (Which, I guess if the dressing up was going as far as the crazy beauty pageant people, I would agree, but really, it's just a pair of shoes.)

The pro-shoe folks have this to say: itty-bitty baby shoes are just too darn cute. That's it. That's their whole argument.

Your sister wore shoes all the time. Her first pair were these little white shoes with pink flowers in a size one that she wore with her baptism outfit at two and half weeks. She had shoes in every size after that. One time, I even bought her a pair of fushia crocs to go with a fushia bathing suit, hat, and bathing suit cover-up when she was six months old. I loved those crocs.

Knowing that I put your sister in shoes so very young, I know it seems silly that I even had this debate, but everyone knows that boys and girls are different and sometimes parents do change how they do things when they think there might be a better way.

In the end, though, this is what it came down to for me.

Itty-bitty baby shoes are just too darn cute.

So mark it down. Your first month birthday was also the day you wore your first pair of shoes.

Love,
Mom

9 comments:

  1. So cute.... Jack and the shoes!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm glad you clarified... I saw "so cute" and thought of the shoes, and then I realized you also meant my son. :)

    Glad to see you on the blog.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nurse Kim's short version: shoes are fine except when baby is pulling up and learning to stand and walk. shoes can (at this stage) prevent formation of proper arches and lead to 'flat feet'. not fun as an adult, take my word for it

    Gramber Kim's short version: put cute shoes on the baby! i love his b-day shoes! just take them off when ever he's gonna bear weight on his feet so his arches can develop properly.

    See? everybody happy!

    ReplyDelete
  4. hmmmm.... now that i'm admiring the cute shoes more closely... those brilliant orange pants seem almost.... fuzzy!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for the reminder about no shoes when he's walking. We're all shoeless inside the house anyway, but still a good reminder.

    The pants are terry cloth NOT velour or velvet. :) Jeremy had the very same thought when he saw the pants and wondered how I got them on Jack with my aversion for velvety fabrics. Terry cloth, though, that's a very nice texture!

    ReplyDelete
  6. i knew there was a catch.... lol

    ReplyDelete
  7. What ever side of the debate you are on, that outfit is adorable!! He looks terribly grown up.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I am coming down on the side of the shoes! My walk just fine, and Myles had the Barnie Rubble feet! Shoes are fun, and make the baby boys so handsome in those sweats and jeans! These anti-shoe people can go barefoot. (I do side with Kim, about the walking, but I differ in that I bought "good" shoes for my kids to walk outside of the house in, rather than be barefoot outside of our home.)

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am anti-baby shoe for only one reason: baby toes are just so cute! But nowadays I fend off the shoe enthusiasts with the learning-to-walk argument. My toe preference is just personal, though. I totally respect the shoe party's views. They are adorable shoes. I'm catching up on blogs now, and I just have to say: Jack is so beautiful!

    ReplyDelete